We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy policy
Automatically convert your audio and video to text using our high-end AI engines.
Let our transcribers perfect your text.
Add subtitles and captions to your videos automatically using our subtitle generator.
Original captions or translated subtitles are created and edited by our subtitlers.
Translated subtitles of unparalleled quality.
Add our Speech-to-text API to your stack and/or request a tailored model.
For filmmakers, production companies, and TV networks.
For universities, e-learning platforms, and schools.
For policy makers, public organizations, and NGOs.
For hospitals and medical research organizations.
For law firms, courts, and compliance teams.
Explore the world of Transcription and Subtitles.
Read how Amberscript helps customers achieve their business goals.
Find the answer on all questions you might have when working with Amberscript.
Get in touch and we will answer your questions.
We make audio accessible.
Ask any researcher about their biggest hurdles, and you’ll rarely hear “lack of ideas.” Instead, it’s the bureaucracy – endless paperwork, grant applications, and compliance approvals that slow everything down. While researchers should be focusing on discoveries, they often find themselves trapped in administrative and manual tasks that delay publications and are a fast way to burn-out.
Fortunately, some of the leading universities have found ways to break through these barriers. Let’s explore seven proven strategies that help speed up the publication process, with real examples from institutions that have successfully put these ideas into practice.
Research gets bogged down by paperwork and bureaucracy. Most academics know the frustration of waiting on approvals, sending countless emails, and watching valuable research time slip away on administrative tasks.
The good news is that universities are starting to tackle this problem head-on. Instead of accepting slow administrative processes as inevitable, they’re looking for ways to make them more efficient. By moving workflows online, simplifying compliance steps, and automating where possible, institutions are helping researchers get back to what matters – their actual research.
Stanford University shows how this can work in practice. They created an online system that handles the administrative process from start to finish. Researchers submit their materials once, and the system automatically routes them to the right people and tracks progress. No more chasing down signatures or wondering where your application is stuck.
The University of Houston took a similar approach with their ethics review process. By streamlining their procedures, they cut review times from 52 days to 46 days – a 15% improvement. While six days might not sound revolutionary, it adds up to significant time savings across all research projects.
Smart systems also face resistance from universities set in their ways. A critical step in ensuring success is getting everyone on board – both researchers and administrators. Creating a task force where both groups work together helps find that sweet spot between following rules and cutting red tape. Starting small with pilot programs can help too, as people tend to embrace change when they see it working.
A researcher working with outdated software (or worse – still using paper) is like a surgeon using blunt instruments. Modern tools can significantly speed up many research stages, like data analysis or literature reviews. Yet many institutions lag behind in equipping their teams with modern technology.
Platforms like NVivo, MAXQDA, and ATLAS.ti can analyze complex datasets in minutes, replacing manual work that once took weeks. AI-driven research tools can automatically generate literature summaries, detect patterns in data, and even help structure academic papers. For qualitative researchers, Amberscript’s advanced transcription technology and human experts converts interviews and focus groups into searchable, analyzable text data.
But buying new tools isn’t enough. Many universities fail to train researchers on how to use them effectively, meaning their full potential goes untapped. The University of Manchester shows how this works, offering regular workshops to help their faculty make the most of these resources.
AI tools are reshaping research workflows in three key areas: literature analysis, data processing, and writing support. For literature reviews, platforms like Elicit, ResearchRabbit, and Scite can analyze thousands of papers quickly, creating structured summaries and citation networks. Data analysis tools like OpenAI’s GPT Assistant and Google’s Vertex AI help clean datasets and spot patterns. Writing assistants such as Writefull and Grammarly support manuscript preparation with reference formatting and language refinement.
But adopting these tools requires careful consideration. First, check your institution’s data protection policies – many universities require tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT to be pre-approved, especially for research data. Second, look for platforms that keep your data in your region – tools like Writefull and DeepL offer EU-hosted versions for GDPR compliance. Third, check data retention policies – some services like ChatGPT-4 may retain your inputs for model training, which could affect research confidentiality.
The most effective approach is to start small: begin with a widely-approved tool like Zotero’s AI features or Grammarly’s basic grammar checks, then gradually expand to more specialized tools as you confirm their reliability and compliance with your institution’s policies. This way, you build a practical toolkit that speeds up research while keeping your data secure.
Research budgets can be tight, but spending smarter often works better than spending more. One of the most effective changes universities can make is centralizing their purchasing to reduce costs.
Instead of each department buying their own software or equipment, some universities have moved to institution-wide purchasing agreements. This approach secures better discounts and ensures all researchers can access the best tools. This also reduces training costs.
The University of Toronto shows how this works – they created shared lab facilities where multiple teams can use high-end equipment, eliminating the need for each department to purchase their own.
Bond University demonstrated the power of this approach, increasing their research investment by over 50% and improving research quality by fostering collaboration and focusing on strategic areas.
Research teams often get caught up in repetitive manual tasks that eat away at their productive time. From data entry and cleaning to formatting citations and managing references, these necessary but time-consuming activities can significantly slow down research progress.
Take transcription in qualitative research, for example. One hour of interview audio typically requires 4-6 hours to transcribe manually, meaning a project with 20 interviews could consume several weeks of a researcher’s time. But this is just one example of manual work that bogs down researchers. Others include manually coding survey responses, reformatting data tables for analysis, or converting documents between different file formats.
Modern solutions combine AI assistance with human oversight to tackle these tasks more efficiently. For transcription, AI tools can create initial drafts that humans then review and correct. Similar approaches work for data cleaning, where automated tools flag potential issues for human review, or for reference management, where software can automatically format citations while researchers verify the accuracy. This hybrid approach maintains quality while drastically reducing the time researchers spend on manual tasks.
Amberscript helps academic researchers eliminate transcription bottlenecks with fast, accurate conversion of audio to text, complete with speaker identification and timestamping. Request a quote from Amberscript today to transform your qualitative research workflow.
The key is identifying which manual tasks consume the most time in your research workflow and finding appropriate tools or services to streamline them. When researchers can delegate or automate routine tasks, they can focus more on the analytical and creative aspects of their work that truly drive research forward.
Some of the most innovative research happens when different fields intersect. Yet at many universities, departments still operate separately, making interdisciplinary research unnecessarily difficult.
The University of Oxford tackled this by creating interdisciplinary research hubs where scientists, engineers, and policy experts collaborate on shared projects. These hubs have accelerated research in areas like AI ethics, public health, and sustainable technologies. Harvard University takes a similar approach with structured networking programs that connect faculty across disciplines.
Universities can strengthen cross-disciplinary work through several strategies:
Fund projects that connect disciplines. Setting aside money specifically for research that brings multiple fields together encourages researchers to step outside their usual domains. For instance, supporting a climate scientist and economist studying extreme weather’s financial impact can lead to more comprehensive insights.
Create joint faculty positions that span multiple departments. This allows experts to work across fields, share insights, and mentor students from different backgrounds. A data scientist working in both computer science and public health, for example, might develop innovative ways to track disease outbreaks.
Develop shared research centers where different types of researchers work side by side on pressing challenges. These centers can focus on broad issues like sustainability, AI ethics, or healthcare innovation. Harvard’s Belfer Center exemplifies this approach, bringing together diverse thinkers to address global security concerns.
Funding significantly impacts research speed. Without proper financial support, projects stall, and researchers spend months securing new grants instead of publishing. Yet grant writing is a skill many researchers lack.
The University of Melbourne addressed this by creating a dedicated grant-writing support office that helps researchers craft compelling proposals and ensures compliance with funding requirements. Their grant success rates have improved notably, reducing time spent on repeated applications.
Another key thing is making the grant search process transparent and accessible. Researchers need to know which internal funding streams they can tap into, what external grants they’re eligible for, and what support is available to help them apply.
Universities can also provide automated grant discovery tools like ResearchConnect or GrantFinder to help researchers quickly find relevant funding opportunities. Internal peer-review programs further strengthen applications by allowing researchers to receive feedback from colleagues with successful funding experience before submission.
Many universities lack clear insight into what’s slowing down their researchers. Some teams struggle with slow ethics approvals, while others face heavy teaching loads or limited funding access. The best institutions use data to identify and address these bottlenecks.
Research heads can track several key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor research productivity:
By monitoring these KPIs, universities can continuously improve their research environment and ensure their teams work under optimal conditions.
The universities leading in research output aren’t just spending more—they’re spending smarter. By eliminating unnecessary admin, using modern technology, outsourcing manual work, and improving funding access, institutions can create an environment where researchers focus on what they do best.
Amberscript supports this smarter approach by turning time-consuming transcription work into a simple, efficient process that accelerates qualitative research. Request a quote today to help your research team focus on discoveries instead of manual tasks.
